FAMILY COURT’S TEMPORARY” ORDERS THAT DRAG ON FOR YEARS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATE OUR RIGHTS AND OUR CHILDREN’S RIGHTS

“[T]his United States Supreme Court has provided definitive guidelines for child custody, as a parent’s Constitutional right t…o exercise, which every state in the Union can choose to ignore, as long as the order is ‘temporary.’

Family Courts routinely generate ‘temporary’ orders which carry on without expiration, and may represent persistent violations of parent’s Constitutional right to the care custody and control of their offspring.

Lower [Family] courts do not have the discretion to temporarily ignore a fit parent’s fundamental rights protected by the Federal and State Constitution just because custody proceedings are pending.”

*Note: It is a common family court tactic to take kids away from Protective Mothers “temporarily”, which ends up being for a very long time. [Later the judge often uses the fact that s/he does not want to disrupt the children’s lives by giving custody back to mom/dad.]

This achieves the first step in the silencing/Stockholming process: Isolate the victims from anyone who supports their accounts of abuse. This enables the perpetrator (with or without help from corrupt court-appointed psychologists) to coerce, threaten, brainwash and/or Stockholm the child(ren) into recanting (or at least staying quiet about) the abuse.

States that favor sole custody in divorce may thus expect to see more divorce than states that encourage joint custody.

On a practical level, joint physical custody makes it less likely that a parent can move to another city to eliminate interaction with the other parent. Because both parents provide for the child directly, child support payments may be somewhat lower with joint custody, reducing financial motives for divorce.

Perhaps most significant, joint custody also removes the capacity for one spouse to hurt the other by denying participation in raising the children.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

• Introducing The Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts Radio Show
• Want To Find Out How The Family Court Works? Now You Can.
• What Principles Guide Our Country?
• Abusive DCF Employees Should Be Fired; Will Union Protect Them?
• Judicial Conference Updates Rules for Judicial Conduct Proceedings, Strategic Plan | United States Courts
• Examining Judicial Accountability and Immunity in the Family Courts ~~ Florida”s 11th Judicial Circuit
• Apply Civil Rights to Family Law – End the Dysfunctional Family Court System
• Who Judges the Judges? Radio….. Guest: Marti Oakley
• A Hayekian Theory of Parental Rights
• Realising the rights of children: Nine policies contend for international award

FAMILY COURT VICTIM

This is EXACTLY what has happened to ME!!!!!!!!!!!! I am still on a “temporary” order going on 2 years now. Of course, no-one will want to “interrupt” my daughter’s life now after 2 years. Even though it was OK that it was interrupted when she was legally kidnapped. This is EXACTLY what has happened to me to a tee. Still on a “temporary” order 2 years later and meanwhile my child has been alienated from me and brainwashed (Stockholm Syndrome, Trauma Bonding, Parental Alienation Syndrome).

Of course, no one will want to interrupt her life now, 2 years later. The abuser will win by default and I will end up bankrupt. I 100% agree with this lawyer. These temporary orders should be UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Ruining lives every day. PLEASE SHARE THIS TO EDUCATE AND BRING AWARENESS.

 

FROM “SAFE KIDS INTERNATIONAL” FACEBOOK PAGE:

 

Attorney Michelle MacDonald Contests “Temporary” Orders Depriving Protective…

View original post 223 more words