A multitude of federal laws now regulate and impact families; some specifically confer jurisdiction on federal courts. As a result, federal courts now hear a growing number of family law cases, especially those that involve complex interjurisdictional or full faith and credit issues. The Supreme Court has contributed to this federalization by “constitutionalizing” family law. It has repeatedly used the U.S. Constitution, in particular the Fourteenth Amendment, to extend constitutional privacy protections to increasing numbers of persons and to invalidate state laws in areas of law previously thought to be the exclusive province of state legislatures.
Originally posted on Welcome to Leon Koziol.Com:
Judge James K. Eby, Oswego County Family Court, Oswego, NY Administrator’s Note: This is the third of a three-part series we call the “Turkey Trilogy.” It is designed to protect all litigants from corrupt judges. You should subscribe to our Parenting Rights Institute if you have any…
Originally posted on Welcome to Leon Koziol.Com:
By Dr. Leon Koziol Parenting Rights Institute As the ever proliferating reform groups come and go across the country, Parenting Rights Institute (PRI) perseveres based on action. Over the years, we have lobbied Congress, sponsored conferences, litigated test cases, interacted with prominent officials, exposed corruption, testified before…
I am easily spotted by those who know me but invisible to those who do not. You will spend your time, your energy and money telling them I am behind this whilst I smile and continue to shred the trust our children once held in you. I am an alienator even when I do not know it and the failure to see the shadows I cast in the projections I throw onto you, is the fault of a system so blinded by bias it is frozen like the minds of our children, the children being harmed right under the noses of those who should know how to help them but sadly, do not.
Making children the winners in custody cases Related articles Why Going No-Contact with a Narcissist is Not the Solution & What to do Instead. Sole custody is harmful to children Uniting Against Court Corruption Tampa Tribune Article – Eliminate Legal Representation in Family Courts Should children have rights when parents and other family members fight? […]
Civil Rights in Family Law Florida 
[…] Source: Child support needs to catch up to reflect new roles for fathers, say experts | Children’s Rights … […]
LikeLiked by 4 people
Shared parenting should always be the starting point. Plus there are new tests out there for psychopathy/narcissism/sociopathy that can show with a brain scan a parent that is a psychopathy and help the courts figure out where the liars/abusers actually are.
The real problem with the brain scan/MRI/pet scan test is that if the judge or the lawyers/child rep/child atty, etc. were to take it, it would likely show they are not qualified either to be involved in these cases.
According to experts (psychiatrists/psychD’s/neuro scientists) all of judges and lawyers have a higher chance of being a psychopath than those in the general population.
The problem with the court system is actually that, and all of doctors, nurses, lawyers, judges, police and teachers should be required to take brain scans/MRI’s/pet scans for psychopathy and then we need to get them out of those roles.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Brigade: Is it Support or Extortion? Protest Florida Child Support System – https://www.brigade.com/positions/16575/reasons/152775
Most judges are breaking the law as they please on child support by denying due process, imputing income only to men, forcing you (men) into jobs they don’t want and many other violations of constitutional rights. This is intimidation to force you to effectively become a slave to the state and your ex-wife. All this is hidden under the claim this is in the “best interest of the children”. Who could argue with what’s best for the children is maximum access to both parents? Most fathers want to support their children in ways other than financially by having them in their home. Child support is effectively a blackmail or extortion system whereby the state takes you children unconstitutionally, and then uses that excuse to charge you extortion fees weekly for the privilege of NOT having your children! You will find here many pages of true stories and reference material. Child Support guidelines would/should meet the following criteria: 1. Child support should only be allowed when a father or mother abandon their child and refuse to take care of them and the parents can not agree among themselves what that should be. It should never be awarded if the parent wants to care for their children for 50% of the time. This is now proven better for children but the courts are still operating of “scientific research” from the 1950’s. Giving custody to the other parent (illegally) is no reason to subject a parent to child support. 2. Child support should not create the huge financial incentive it does for the custodial parent to get a free ride on the other parent for 18-23 years. Child support would be capped at some reasonable and necessary level of expenses per child and shared equally by both parents, or in proportion to earnings. When a divorce happens it is ridiculous and unfair to expect the standard of living of two households to remain the same when the same income now supports both. The second parent must work more, as the first parent was likely already working full-time time. The second parent can not be made to work twice as much! 3. Child support should be about the incremental cost of the children, not including the living expenses of the custodial spouse. Child support would take into account the real costs and the percentage of time the children spend with each parent. Child support should NOT be a function of a parents income, but a function of what a reasonable and married parent would actually spend on the children (Massachusetts imply families spend 80% of their take-home pay on their children by charging dad 40% of take-home pay in child extortion.) Taking away a parents right to decide what to spend on their child after divorce denies them a right they have in marriage and creates a class of people that are discriminated against by this artificially created classification. http://www.causes.com/causes/804504-american-fa
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person